(1) This Act may be called the Right to Fair. Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, (2) It extends to the . Abstract. This article presents a clear picture of controversial policies pertaining to land acquisition, resettlement, rehabilitation and. PDF | Land acquisition is essential for the development of a country in order to which has changed many clauses of the Act. This paper.

Land Acquisition Act 2013 Pdf

Language:English, Indonesian, French
Published (Last):26.01.2016
ePub File Size:18.80 MB
PDF File Size:17.61 MB
Distribution:Free* [*Sign up for free]
Uploaded by: WINSTON

Home Acts Rules Policiesacts Acts, Rules & Policies and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, ( MB) pdf. This Act may be called the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in. LandAcquisition, Rehabilitation and ResettlementAct, Shorl title, extent and . Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, ” (LARR Act, ). On 21st The Planning and Compulsory download Act ITALY.

This wage rate in rural India study included the following agricultural operations common in India: ploughing, sowing, weeding, transplanting, harvesting, winnowing, threshing, picking, herdsmen, tractor driver, unskilled help, mason, etc. Compensation prices variation place to place 3. Compensation as per newly amended bill is not distributed Under below mentioned circumstances Example[ edit ] Land acquired in the period bill is under discussion in parliament.

Not many changes are done in bill after parliamentary discussions and LARR bill passed with marginal changes. The Act will also affect urban households in India whose land or property is acquired. With an average rural household size of 5. According to Government of India, the contribution of agriculture to Indian economy's gross domestic product has been steadily dropping with every decade since its independence.

As of , about Act will mandate higher payments for land as well as guaranteed entitlements from India's non-agriculture-derived GDP to the people supported by agriculture-derived GDP.

It is expected that the Act will directly affect Act provides to compensate rural households — both land owners and livelihood losers. The Act goes beyond compensation, it mandates guaranteed series of entitlements to rural households affected. This according to them shall guarantee neither social justice nor the efficient use of resources.

This misaligns the interests of land acquirer and those affected. Once the payment is made, one or more of the affected families may seek to delay the progress of the project to extract additional compensation, thereby adversely affecting those who chose long term employment in the affected families.

The Bill, these economists suggest, should link compensation and entitlements to the progress and success of the project, such as through partial compensation in form of land bonds. These success-linked infrastructure bonds may also help poor states reduce the upfront cost of land acquisition for essential public projects such as hospitals, schools, universities, affordable housing, clean drinking water treatment plants, electricity power generation plants, sewage treatment plants, flood control reservoirs, and highways necessary to bring relief to affected public during fires, epidemics, earthquakes, floods and other natural disasters.

The state of Kerala has decided to pursue the use of infrastructure bonds as a form of payment to land owners. The Bill should place a limit on total value of entitlement benefits that can be annually claimed per acre, this entitlement pool should then be divided between the affected families, and the government should run this program if it is considered to be fair.

Dispossession and Resistance in India and Mexico

LARR as proposed severely curtails free market transactions between willing sellers and willing downloaders. For example, DLF Limited — India's largest real estate developer — claims that the current bill may limit private companies such as DLF from developing affordable housing for millions of Indians.

DLF suggests that direct land transactions with owners on a willing voluntary basis, at market-determined rate, should be kept out of the purview of the bill. An article in The Wall Street Journal claims that the proposed LARR rules will apply even when any private company acquires acres of land or more.

The WSJ article further claims that the proposed LARR bill doesn't actually define the word "acquisition," and leaves open a loophole that could allow government agencies to continue banking land indefinitely. Where the number affected is greater than families in the plains and families in the hills, the LAA Amendment Bill introduced the requirement of a Social Impact Assessment report, keeping in mind the impact on marginalized communities in particular.

The proposed amendment further brought to the fore the need to desist from acquiring irrigated multi-crop agricultural land and made a provision to follow the principle of minimum displacement, minimum disturbance to infrastructure and ecology. The period for presenting objections was increased to 60 days and a time frame was put in place to complete the process of disbursement of compensation and provision of rehabilitation and resettlement.

There was an increase in the compensation for land, taking into account an increase in the value of the land once put to its proposed use, and a restriction in state intervention for acquisition of land for companies to thirty per cent of the land where seventy per cent of the land would have to be acquired by the company itself through download in the market.

In order to settle disputes regarding land acquisition it proposed a Land Acquisition Compensation Disputes Settlement Authority to adjudicate all such disputes within six months.

The Relief and Rehabilitation Bill mandated the procedures for determining eligibility and benefits for affected individuals and put in place authorities and bodies to oversee the process.

However, it did not make compulsory the resettlement of affected people, but instead merely mandated the procedure.

Its mechanism of grievance redressal was problematic in granting authority likened to that of a court to authorities outside of the judiciary. The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act In , on recommendations of NAC to combine the two Bills, a comprehensive Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill was introduced in the Parliament to replace the existing Land Acquisition Act and bring the process of land acquisition and subsequent rehabilitation of the affected population into the ambit of one single law.

Certain key new elements introduced in this Bill included the increase in compensation values to four times the market price of land in rural areas, and two times the market value in urban areas.

While it limited the acquisition of land for public purposes only, it included private companies as well as public-private partnership projects within the ambit of the law, requiring the consent of 80 per cent of displaced people in this case. The state had to be enabled to acquire land swiftly while minimizing compensation payment, seen as a drain on the state exchequer. Further, there was a need for mobilizing larger amounts of land for expanding railways in the country. The imperial stance was evident in one simple fact: public purpose was neither defined nor elaborated by the law; it was sufficient for the state to declare it to be so.

Intricate and elaborate rules were framed to keep compensation payments to a minimum. This Act made the collectors award of compensation final unless alerted by a decree of the Civil Court in a regular suit and it helped speed up the process of determining compensation.

Account Options

The Land Acquisition Act of , meant to bring some uniformity to the acquisition decisions of the Empire, now that it had consolidated its hold since It means to amend the law for the acquisition of land for public purposes and for companies and to determine the amount of compensation to be made on account of such acquisition. This meant a single law to control a single administration, one that also helped derive legitimacy for the administrative foundations of empire.

In a predominantly agricultural landscape, such a law also provided a basis to generate revenue from the productive uses of land.

It was only in , after the Non-Cooperation movement, and after Indian leaders entered Local Administration through elections, that the amendment of Section 5A to the Act was introduced: one that allowed the possibility of raising objections, albeit with a warning on its limitations.

The Statement of objects and Reasons contained in Bill No. Instead the amendment was supposed to be a check on the local government, by prohibiting the declaration of any such acquisition for public purposes, until objections were considered by the local government. In other words, the idea of objection was introduced while leaving open the possibilities for interpretation of such objection, and more significantly, in a manner that did not obstruct the land acquisition itself.

The end of colonial rule in and the Republican Constitution of did not bring about any significant change in the land acquisition law. The Constitution of India, by Article , allowed all colonial laws to remain in force unless they were explicitly repealed.


Despite several amendments of the Act after Independence, the two basic principles of Land acquisition, viz 1. Compensation on market value remain unchanged. The various criticisms of Land Acquisition Act in India have also centered round these two cardinal principles.

One of the major criticisms of the Land Acquisition Act is that the expression public purpose is nowhere defined in the Act and in India the courts do not have the power to decide whether the purpose behind a particular acquisition was a public purpose. The court can only direct the collector to hear the objections of a person whos Land has been acquired, but the collector may not always listen to the objection raised by the legal owner of the Land.

The Act, describes the processes that have to be used by the state to acquire land for either itself or for a company. Although the Central Government broadly determines the contents of the law, there can be regional variations in procedural matters.

Land acquisition act,

Land Acquisition is a process that every country goes through as it marches on the path of development. Land being a scarce resource has traditionally always had various power holders claiming ownership.GoMP also follows the Land Acquisition Madhya Pradesh Amendment Act, applicable to the municipal limits of Bhopal the state capital The government has decided to introduce an ordinance to make major changes in the existing Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act The Entitlement Matrix has been approved by the Railway Board, Ministry of Managing this wealth needs effective care, concern, and governance.

What is the problem with land acquisition act of ? While the former is used when the acquiring body is the Central or state government or companies that are either owned, partly owned or controlled by the State, the latter is used in case of non-government companies.


First and foremost, it establishes and foregrounds the principle of eminent domain, a principle that grants the state, in the last instance, right to all property under its domain. Agricultural Land Values". Use Indian English from March All Wikipedia articles written in Indian English Use dmy dates from March Articles needing expert attention with no reason or talk parameter Articles needing expert attention from November All articles needing expert attention Law articles needing expert attention Wikipedia articles in need of updating from September All Wikipedia articles in need of updating Articles with multiple maintenance issues.

SHIRLEY from Round Lake Beach
I love studying docunments patiently . Also read my other posts. I'm keen on eton wall game.